Beauty is the property of being that arrests us in contemplation. It is the aspect of reality we encounter not through use or analysis but through seeing. It is the one transcendental Aquinas never gave a dedicated question to, which makes it either the simplest or the most elusive. I suspect both.
"Pulchrum autem respicit vim cognoscitivam: pulchra enim dicuntur quae visa placent." (On the other hand, beauty relates to the cognitive faculty; for beautiful things are those which please when seen.)[1]
That definition is deliberately spare. Aquinas tucked it into a reply about goodness rather than giving it its own treatment, and the history of Christian thought on beauty is accordingly more scattered: Augustine's Confessions, Bonaventure's Itinerarium, Balthasar's Glory of the Lord. I'm not trying to synthesize all of that. I'm trying to pay closer attention to what stops me in my tracks and ask why.
References
- Summa Theologiae I, Question 5, Article 4, ad 1Source
No articles here yet.